Typical scenario

A vessel's draught change was attributed solely to loaded cargo

If a post-loading draught change is used to confirm cargo mass, it may also reflect changes in other onboard quantities. Ballast operations may occur between draught readings, with a combined volume recorded without distinguishing intake, discharge and internal transfers. The compared vessel states must be reconstructed.

What needs to be clarified

Check whether recorded ballast and stores changes between draught observations were included, and identify which parts of the cargo-mass calculation depend on unsupported assumptions.

Materials to prepare

  • Draught observation sheets with times and recording conditions
  • Ballast operation book and individual tank level records
  • Cargo calculation, vessel tables and stores-change records

What to compare

Compare observation times with operations, tank designations and units. Separate internal transfers from intake or overboard discharge. Check consistent stores, water-density and vessel-attitude inputs; do not automatically attribute an unaccounted ballast change to loaded cargo in the recalculation.

Possible outcome of the analysis

The review may provide a comparison of vessel states, check the documented balance of changes and list assumptions affecting the cargo-mass conclusion in the supplied draught calculation.

Limits of the conclusions

The review is not a vessel survey and does not confirm permissible loading. Unknown volumes cannot be replaced with confident calculated figures without consistent observations and tank records.